Sunday, November 23, 2008

High Court of Injustice Did NOT Order Evacuation of Beit H'Shalom! Government Staging Politically Motivated Evacuation To Sway Voters


The difference between what the government "must" do and "may" do are two completely different things.

If the Supreme Court said that the government "may" remove the families from Beit H'Shalom in Hevron, but did not REQUIRE them to remove those families, then the expense and trouble the government is taking in trying to remove those families must be seen in a completely new light.

It appears that the entire Beit H'Shalom showdown is one manufactured by the left in order to politicize the situation before elections. This sheds a very bad light upon Olmert and his ilk, exposing Kadima's charade for what it is.

I was disgusted before, now I am simply sick. Please, please, please, just arrest Olmert and get him off our streets before he causes a civil war!! The man is dangerous and completely out of control.

Ex-Judge: Supreme Court Didn’t Order Beit HaShalom Eviction
by Hillel Fendel

( A former Supreme Court justice says that the media misled the public and Defense Minister Ehud Barak into thinking that the Supreme Court has ordered the evacuation of Jews from Peace House in Hevron.

Yaakov Turkel, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for ten years until 2005, says that the ruling in question does not order the State to evict the Jews, but rather allows them to do so. He spoke with Arutz-7's Shimon Cohen and Uzi Baruch.

The ruling in question was issued a week ago, and gave the Jews living in Peace House – a four-story structure along the road leading from Kiryat Arba into Hevron – three days to leave the building. After that period, the ruling states, “it will be possible to act in accordance with Squatters’ Evacuation Law.”

Turkel emphasizes that, unlike the media reports and announcements by Defense Minister Barak and other public officials, “the ruling does not obligate the State to act to evacuate the Jews, but rather gives them the freedom to decide whether to do so or not.”
In light of Turkel's statements, it appears that Public Security Minister Avi Dichter of Kadima did not read the ruling.

The ruling, and the manner in which it was understood by the media and the public, aroused great opposition to the Supreme Court among the nationalist public, as well as great tensions in Hevron in anticipation of an Amona-like clash in the building.

The 20 families that live there, plus many more people who have arrived over the last few days - and especially for this past Sabbath, when the Torah portion of Patriarch Abraham's purchase of Hevron land is read aloud - began making preparations to try and rebuff security forces that may try to evict them.

Ruling States: Jews 'May' - not 'Must' - be Evicted
The Court ruled that the Jewish occupants “may” be removed, despite the fact that they had produced written, audio and video proof that the Arab owner had sold it to them.

“When the Defense Minister said he would abide by the Supreme Court ruling ordering the Jews’ eviction,” Turkel said, “this was very much not to my liking, since there was no such order… This misunderstanding has caused the great rift in the religious and right-wing’s trust in the Supreme Court.”

In light of Turkel's statements, it appears that Public Security Minister Avi Dichter of Kadima did not read the ruling. "The ruling is not a recommendation, and we will implement it exactly as written," he said last week, promising that within 30 days, no Jews would be living in the disputed building. "We have no intention of straying from the Supreme Court ruling, which is the law," he said.

Turkel: It Belongs in a Lower Court
Asked how he would have ruled if he had been on the judicial panel, Justice Turkel said, “I would have passed the matter down to the District Court, in light of the complexity of the case and the mutual claims of forgery. The District Court would then review the evidence and decide if an evacuation order should be issued before a final ruling.”

This is in keeping with long-standing practice that the Supreme Court does not rule on matters pertaining to civil disputes between individuals.

1 comment:

  1. Even if they technically did not ordered the eviction, the "rule of law" of the Kadima regime has the pretext it was looking for to end their governance they way they started it: with violence, abuse, and expulsion of Jews from their own land.
    Beit HaShalom may be legitimately Jewish property. But the Olmert clan will overlook that. They will not let a legal technicality get on their way.


Please do not use comments to personally attack other posters.